Horch vs Otter.ai
A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.
Horch Audio | Otter.ai Audio | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Privacy-first, on-device meeting assistant for macOS | AI meeting notetaker that transcribes calls, summarizes them, and pulls out action items in real time. |
| Category | Audio | Audio |
| Pricing | Paid· One-time purchase: €49 once | Freemium· Basic: $20 · Pro: $50 · Enterprise: Contact sales |
| Model | Whisper (local) for transcription; optional Ollama / MLX local LLMs for summarization | Proprietary speech + LLM stack |
| Editorial score | — | 6.8 / 10 |
| Use cases | Confidential client meeting transcriptionAutomatic action-item extractionPer-contact relationship historyPre-meeting briefings from prior callsLocal Whisper transcription without cloud uploadFeeding meeting context into Claude or Cursor via MCPPersonal second-brain in MarkdownLegal, medical, or NDA-bound conversation notes | meeting-transcriptionmeeting-summariesaction-itemssales-call-noteslive-captions |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Website | horch.app | otter.ai |
Pick Horch if
- ✅ Fully on-device by default — audio and transcripts never leave the Mac unless the user opts in
- ✅ One-time €49 purchase instead of a recurring per-seat SaaS bill
- ✅ Records at OS level so no bot appears in the meeting and any app (Zoom, Meet, Teams, in-person) works
- ✅ Notes stored as plain Markdown in ~/Meetings — portable, greppable, Obsidian-friendly
Pick Otter.ai if
- ✅ Genuinely free tier covers casual meeting notes without a trial clock
- ✅ Joins Zoom/Meet/Teams as a bot and ships desktop bot-free recording
- ✅ Strong CRM and workspace integrations (Salesforce, HubSpot, Slack, Notion)
- ✅ MCP server lets Claude/ChatGPT query your meeting history directly