RAGFlow vs RAGs by LlamaIndex
A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.
Tagline
RAGFlow
Open-source RAG engine with deep document parsing, hybrid search, and visual agent orchestration.RAGs by LlamaIndex
Open-source Streamlit app that builds a custom RAG pipeline from a natural-language brief.Pricing
RAGFlow
FreemiumΒ· Free tier; Starter $29/mo; Pro $129/mo; Enterprise customRAGs by LlamaIndex
FreeΒ· Free, MIT-licensed; bring your own model/API keysFree trial
RAGFlow
YesRAGs by LlamaIndex
YesAPI
RAGFlow
YesRAGs by LlamaIndex
Not listedPlatforms
RAGFlow
api
RAGs by LlamaIndex
api
Open source
RAGFlow
Yes Β· Apache-2.0RAGs by LlamaIndex
Yes Β· MITGitHub stars
RAGFlow
91,511
checked 2026-09-29
RAGs by LlamaIndex
6,551
checked 2026-09-29
Last GitHub push
RAGFlow
2026-09-29RAGs by LlamaIndex
2024-04-05First commit
RAGFlow
2023-12RAGs by LlamaIndex
2023-11Model used
RAGFlow
Multi-modelRAGs by LlamaIndex
Multi-model (OpenAI, Anthropic, Replicate, HuggingFace)Best for
RAGFlow
Pick RAGFlow if you need a self-hostable, citation-grounded RAG stack that can actually digest gnarly enterprise documents and feed agents.RAGs by LlamaIndex
Pick RAGs if you want to stand up a LlamaIndex-powered chatbot over your own documents in an afternoon without writing the plumbing.Not for
RAGFlow
Skip it if you just want a hosted chat-with-PDF widget or you're allergic to running your own infrastructure.RAGs by LlamaIndex
Skip it if you need a managed, SLA-backed RAG product with evals, auth and team features out of the box.Editorial score
RAGFlow
8.1 / 10RAGs by LlamaIndex
7.0 / 10Use cases
RAGFlow
document-qaenterprise-searchagent-orchestrationknowledge-basehybrid-retrieval
RAGs by LlamaIndex
natural-language-rag-builderdocument-qallamaindex-prototypingchatbot-over-private-data
Pros
RAGFlow
- Strong deep-document parsing for messy PDFs, tables, and scans
- Hybrid vector + BM25 retrieval with citation-grounded answers
- Fully open-source with active GitHub repo and self-host option
- Visual agent builder plus MCP integration for tool-calling clients
- Model-agnostic; works with most major LLM providers
RAGs by LlamaIndex
- MIT-licensed and self-hostable with full control over data
- Natural-language interface to configure a real LlamaIndex RAG pipeline
- Provider-agnostic: OpenAI, Anthropic, Replicate and HuggingFace LLMs
- Exposes chunk size, top-K and embedding model as tunable knobs
Cons
RAGFlow
- Free tier blocks API access, pushing real use to paid plans
- Self-hosting is non-trivial and resource-hungry
- Documentation and UI lag behind the engine's capabilities
RAGs by LlamaIndex
- Streamlit reference app, not a production-grade hosted service
- Maintenance-mode repo with relatively few commits
- Requires your own API keys and infra to run
- No built-in auth, eval or multi-tenant support
Editorial score: rule-based, 0β10, from AI-assisted profile inputs (see /methodology) β not a user rating; βββ means unscored. βNot listedβ means we have no record of it, not that it is absent. GitHub figures and prices carry the date they were checked or captured; prices are shown as published, unconverted.
Pick RAGFlow if
- β Strong deep-document parsing for messy PDFs, tables, and scans
- β Hybrid vector + BM25 retrieval with citation-grounded answers
- β Fully open-source with active GitHub repo and self-host option
- β Visual agent builder plus MCP integration for tool-calling clients
Pick RAGs by LlamaIndex if
- β MIT-licensed and self-hostable with full control over data
- β Natural-language interface to configure a real LlamaIndex RAG pipeline
- β Provider-agnostic: OpenAI, Anthropic, Replicate and HuggingFace LLMs
- β Exposes chunk size, top-K and embedding model as tunable knobs