LLaMA Factory vs Ludwig
A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.
Tagline
LLaMA Factory
Open-source, no-code WebUI for fine-tuning 100+ open LLMs with LoRA, QLoRA, DPO, and PPO.Ludwig
Declarative, YAML-driven deep learning framework for fine-tuning LLMs and multi-modal models without writing training loops.Pricing
LLaMA Factory
FreeΒ· Free, open-source (Apache-2.0); self-hostedLudwig
FreeΒ· Free, Apache 2.0 open sourceFree trial
LLaMA Factory
YesLudwig
YesAPI
LLaMA Factory
YesLudwig
YesPlatforms
LLaMA Factory
api
Ludwig
linuxapi
Open source
LLaMA Factory
Yes Β· Apache-2.0Ludwig
Yes Β· Apache-2.0GitHub stars
LLaMA Factory
75,193
checked 2026-09-29
Ludwig
11,771
checked 2026-09-29
Last GitHub push
LLaMA Factory
2026-09-28Ludwig
2026-09-28First commit
LLaMA Factory
2023-05Ludwig
2018-12Model used
LLaMA Factory
Multi-model (LLaMA, Mistral, Qwen, Gemma, Phi, LLaVA, ChatGLM, Yi)Ludwig
Multi-model (PyTorch + HuggingFace Transformers)Best for
LLaMA Factory
Pick LLaMA Factory if you want one tool to fine-tune any open-weight LLM on your own hardware without writing custom training scripts.Ludwig
Pick Ludwig if you want reproducible, config-driven fine-tuning runs across LLMs and multi-modal tasks without writing training loops from scratch.Not for
LLaMA Factory
Skip it if you want a managed, click-to-train cloud service or don't have access to suitable GPUs.Ludwig
Skip it if you want a hosted, click-to-fine-tune service or if your model needs deeply custom layers that don't fit a YAML schema.Editorial score
LLaMA Factory
7.2 / 10Ludwig
8.2 / 10Use cases
LLaMA Factory
lora-fine-tuningqloradpo-alignmentinstruction-tuningrlhfvlm-fine-tuning
Ludwig
llm-fine-tuningmulti-modal-trainingtext-classificationtabular-mlmodel-servingdistributed-training
Pros
LLaMA Factory
- No-code WebUI (LlamaBoard) covers SFT, DPO, PPO, KTO, and reward modeling
- Supports 100+ open models including multimodal VLMs out of the box
- Full QLoRA stack (2-8 bit) plus LoRA+, DoRA, PiSSA variants
- Acceleration via FlashAttention-2, Unsloth, Liger Kernel, vLLM inference
- Exports to GGUF / Ollama and integrates with W&B, MLflow, TensorBoard
Ludwig
- Entire pipeline defined in one YAML file - no boilerplate training code
- First-class LLM fine-tuning with SFT, DPO, ORPO, GRPO and LoRA/QLoRA
- True multi-modal: text, images, audio, tabular and time series in one model
- Scale from laptop to Ray cluster by changing the backend, not the code
- Open source under Apache 2.0, backed by Linux Foundation
Cons
LLaMA Factory
- Self-hosted only β you bring the GPUs and the ops
- Rapid release cadence means version pinning is essential
- WebUI abstracts but does not solve VRAM and dataset-formatting pitfalls
Ludwig
- Self-hosted only - no managed tier, you supply the GPUs
- Declarative abstraction can be limiting for highly custom architectures
- Steeper ramp for teams without PyTorch or Ray familiarity
Editorial score: rule-based, 0β10, from AI-assisted profile inputs (see /methodology) β not a user rating; βββ means unscored. βNot listedβ means we have no record of it, not that it is absent. GitHub figures and prices carry the date they were checked or captured; prices are shown as published, unconverted.
Pick LLaMA Factory if
- β No-code WebUI (LlamaBoard) covers SFT, DPO, PPO, KTO, and reward modeling
- β Supports 100+ open models including multimodal VLMs out of the box
- β Full QLoRA stack (2-8 bit) plus LoRA+, DoRA, PiSSA variants
- β Acceleration via FlashAttention-2, Unsloth, Liger Kernel, vLLM inference
Pick Ludwig if
- β Entire pipeline defined in one YAML file - no boilerplate training code
- β First-class LLM fine-tuning with SFT, DPO, ORPO, GRPO and LoRA/QLoRA
- β True multi-modal: text, images, audio, tabular and time series in one model
- β Scale from laptop to Ray cluster by changing the backend, not the code