Fireworks AI vs Together AI
A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.
Fireworks AI Fine-tuning | Together AI Fine-tuning | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Production inference and fine-tuning platform for open-source LLMs, tuned for speed and enterprise economics. | Fine-tune & serve open-weight models (Llama, Mistral, DeepSeek). |
| Category | Fine-tuning | Fine-tuning |
| Pricing | Freemium· Free signup credits; pay-per-token from ~$0.14/M in; enterprise reserved capacity on request | Paid· Pay-per-token; fine-tuning per-token |
| Model | Multi-model (DeepSeek, Qwen, GLM, Kimi, Gemma, Minimax, others) | Llama / Mistral / Qwen / DeepSeek and others |
| Editorial score | — | 8.6 / 10 |
| Use cases | llm-fine-tuningserverless-inferencemulti-lora-servingcode-assistantsagentic-systems | open modelsfine-tuninginference |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Website | fireworks.ai | www.together.ai |
Pick Fireworks AI if
- ✅ OpenAI- and Anthropic-compatible APIs against open-weight models
- ✅ Strong fine-tuning + multi-LoRA hosting on a shared base
- ✅ Serverless, on-demand, and reserved-capacity tiers cover most load shapes
- ✅ Used in production by Cursor, Sourcegraph, Vercel, Notion
Pick Together AI if
- ✅ Wide open-model catalogue
- ✅ Competitive inference pricing
- ✅ Fine-tune + serve in one place
- ✅ Dedicated endpoints for production