Skip to main content
πŸ“– The AI Tool Bible

Exa vs Firecrawl

A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.

Tagline
Exa
Web search API built for AI agents, with structured outputs and token-efficient highlights.
Firecrawl
Web scraping and crawling API that returns LLM-ready markdown, JSON, or structured data from any URL.
Pricing
Exa
FreemiumΒ· Free Tier: Free Β· Search: $7/1k requests Β· Agent: $0.012–$1.00/run Β· Contents: $1/1k pages per content type Β· Deep Search: $12–15/1k requests
Firecrawl
FreemiumΒ· Free Plan: $0 Β· Hobby: $16 Β· Standard: $83 Β· Growth: $333 Β· Scale: $599/monthly
Lowest paid tier
Exa
$0.012–$1.00/run Β· Agent
captured 2026-08-08
Firecrawl
$16 Β· Hobby
captured 2026-08-10
Free trial
Exa
Yes
Firecrawl
Yes
API
Exa
Yes
Firecrawl
Yes
Platforms
Exa
api
Firecrawl
apicli
Open source
Exa
Not listed
Firecrawl
Yes Β· AGPL-3.0
GitHub stars
Exa
β€”
Firecrawl
186,626
checked 2026-09-29
Last GitHub push
Exa
β€”
Firecrawl
2026-09-29
First commit
Exa
β€”
Firecrawl
2024-04
Model used
Exa
Proprietary neural + keyword search
Firecrawl
Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, OpenAI, Gemini
Best for
Exa
Pick Exa if you are wiring web retrieval into an AI agent and want a single API that returns clean, schema-shaped, token-efficient results.
Firecrawl
Pick Firecrawl if you are building a RAG pipeline or AI agent and want one API call to turn any URL into clean, token-efficient markdown.
Not for
Exa
Skip it if you need a self-hosted or open-source search stack, or your retrieval is purely over internal documents.
Firecrawl
Skip it if you only need to scrape a handful of static pages and a quick fetch+cheerio script would do, or if you have hard data-egress constraints.
Editorial score
Exa
8.0 / 10
Firecrawl
8.0 / 10
Use cases
Exa
agent-web-searchrag-retrievalcompany-researchpeople-searchcode-searchdeep-research
Firecrawl
web-scrapingrag-ingestionagent-browsingsite-crawlingpdf-parsing
Pros
Exa
  • Purpose-built for LLM/agent use, not retrofitted consumer search
  • Highlights mode dramatically cuts tokens sent to the model
  • Structured JSON outputs against custom schemas
  • Vertical indexes for companies, people, and code
  • SOC 2 Type II with zero-retention enterprise option
Firecrawl
  • Returns clean LLM-ready markdown/JSON without custom scraper code
  • Handles JS rendering, anti-bot, and PDFs out of the box
  • Open source with SDKs in six languages plus an MCP server
  • Generous 1,000-credit free tier and predictable per-page pricing
Cons
Exa
  • Proprietary, closed source
  • Pricing not transparent on homepage beyond the free playground
  • Coverage and freshness depend on Exa's crawl, not yours
Firecrawl
  • Credit model gets expensive on million-URL crawls vs DIY scrapers
  • Self-hosting is non-trivial compared with the managed API
  • Browser interact actions burn credits quickly on long sessions
Website
Firecrawl
firecrawl.dev

Editorial score: rule-based, 0–10, from AI-assisted profile inputs (see /methodology) β€” not a user rating; β€œβ€”β€ means unscored. β€œNot listed” means we have no record of it, not that it is absent. GitHub figures and prices carry the date they were checked or captured; prices are shown as published, unconverted.

Pick Exa if
  • βœ… Purpose-built for LLM/agent use, not retrofitted consumer search
  • βœ… Highlights mode dramatically cuts tokens sent to the model
  • βœ… Structured JSON outputs against custom schemas
  • βœ… Vertical indexes for companies, people, and code
Pick Firecrawl if
  • βœ… Returns clean LLM-ready markdown/JSON without custom scraper code
  • βœ… Handles JS rendering, anti-bot, and PDFs out of the box
  • βœ… Open source with SDKs in six languages plus an MCP server
  • βœ… Generous 1,000-credit free tier and predictable per-page pricing