Skip to main content
πŸ“– The AI Tool Bible

SGLang vs vLLM

A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.

Tagline
SGLang
Open-source high-throughput inference engine for LLMs and multimodal models with OpenAI-compatible serving.
vLLM
Open-source high-throughput inference engine for serving LLMs with PagedAttention and continuous batching.
Pricing
SGLang
FreeΒ· Free, open-source (Apache 2.0); self-hosted infra cost only
vLLM
FreeΒ· Free and open-source (Apache 2.0); self-hosted infrastructure costs apply
Free trial
SGLang
Yes
vLLM
Yes
API
SGLang
Yes
vLLM
Yes
Platforms
SGLang
api
vLLM
macosapi
Open source
SGLang
Yes Β· Apache-2.0
vLLM
Yes Β· Apache-2.0
GitHub stars
SGLang
36,602
checked 2026-09-29
vLLM
92,958
checked 2026-09-29
Last GitHub push
SGLang
2026-09-29
vLLM
2026-09-29
First commit
SGLang
2024-01
vLLM
2023-02
Model used
SGLang
Multi-model (DeepSeek, Qwen, Llama, Mistral, GLM, GPT-OSS)
vLLM
Multi-model (open-weight LLMs: Llama, Qwen, DeepSeek, Mistral, Gemma, Phi, etc.)
Best for
SGLang
Pick SGLang if you are running open-weight LLMs on your own GPUs and need top-tier throughput with an OpenAI-compatible interface.
vLLM
Pick vLLM if you are self-hosting open-weight LLMs at any meaningful scale and need an OpenAI-compatible endpoint with maximum tokens-per-dollar.
Not for
SGLang
Skip it if you want a hosted inference API you can hit with a credit card and zero ops.
vLLM
Skip it if you don't run your own GPUs or you'd rather pay a managed inference provider than tune batching, parallelism, and KV cache yourself.
Editorial score
SGLang
8.2 / 10
vLLM
8.3 / 10
Use cases
SGLang
llm-servingmultimodal-inferenceself-hostingopenai-compatible-apihigh-throughput-inference
vLLM
llm-servingself-hosted-inferenceopenai-api-replacementhigh-throughput-batchingmulti-gpu-deployment
Pros
SGLang
  • State-of-the-art throughput via speculative decoding and disaggregated prefill/decode
  • OpenAI-compatible endpoints make migration from hosted APIs trivial
  • Broad hardware coverage: NVIDIA, AMD, TPU, Ascend, XPU, CPU
  • Backed by real production users (NVIDIA, xAI, Oracle, LinkedIn)
  • Fully open source under Apache 2.0
vLLM
  • PagedAttention delivers industry-leading throughput on the same hardware
  • Drop-in OpenAI-compatible API makes migration from hosted models trivial
  • Broad hardware support spanning NVIDIA, AMD, Intel, TPU, and Neuron
  • Apache-2.0, no per-token cost, no vendor lock-in
  • Backed by Berkeley + major-cloud sponsors with very active release cadence
Cons
SGLang
  • Self-hosted only; no managed inference offering
  • Tuning for peak throughput requires real ML-infra expertise
  • Documentation assumes you already know LLM-serving concepts
vLLM
  • You provide and operate the GPUs; no managed offering
  • Steep learning curve for tuning parallelism, quantization, and KV cache
  • Bleeding-edge model support sometimes lags the model's release by days
  • Multi-node deployment requires Ray or Kubernetes plumbing
Website
SGLang
sglang.io

Editorial score: rule-based, 0–10, from AI-assisted profile inputs (see /methodology) β€” not a user rating; β€œβ€”β€ means unscored. β€œNot listed” means we have no record of it, not that it is absent. GitHub figures and prices carry the date they were checked or captured; prices are shown as published, unconverted.

Pick SGLang if
  • βœ… State-of-the-art throughput via speculative decoding and disaggregated prefill/decode
  • βœ… OpenAI-compatible endpoints make migration from hosted APIs trivial
  • βœ… Broad hardware coverage: NVIDIA, AMD, TPU, Ascend, XPU, CPU
  • βœ… Backed by real production users (NVIDIA, xAI, Oracle, LinkedIn)
Pick vLLM if
  • βœ… PagedAttention delivers industry-leading throughput on the same hardware
  • βœ… Drop-in OpenAI-compatible API makes migration from hosted models trivial
  • βœ… Broad hardware support spanning NVIDIA, AMD, Intel, TPU, and Neuron
  • βœ… Apache-2.0, no per-token cost, no vendor lock-in