SGLang vs vLLM
A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.
Tagline
SGLang
Open-source high-throughput inference engine for LLMs and multimodal models with OpenAI-compatible serving.vLLM
Open-source high-throughput inference engine for serving LLMs with PagedAttention and continuous batching.Pricing
SGLang
FreeΒ· Free, open-source (Apache 2.0); self-hosted infra cost onlyvLLM
FreeΒ· Free and open-source (Apache 2.0); self-hosted infrastructure costs applyFree trial
SGLang
YesvLLM
YesAPI
SGLang
YesvLLM
YesPlatforms
SGLang
api
vLLM
macosapi
Open source
SGLang
Yes Β· Apache-2.0vLLM
Yes Β· Apache-2.0GitHub stars
SGLang
36,602
checked 2026-09-29
vLLM
92,958
checked 2026-09-29
Last GitHub push
SGLang
2026-09-29vLLM
2026-09-29First commit
SGLang
2024-01vLLM
2023-02Model used
SGLang
Multi-model (DeepSeek, Qwen, Llama, Mistral, GLM, GPT-OSS)vLLM
Multi-model (open-weight LLMs: Llama, Qwen, DeepSeek, Mistral, Gemma, Phi, etc.)Best for
SGLang
Pick SGLang if you are running open-weight LLMs on your own GPUs and need top-tier throughput with an OpenAI-compatible interface.vLLM
Pick vLLM if you are self-hosting open-weight LLMs at any meaningful scale and need an OpenAI-compatible endpoint with maximum tokens-per-dollar.Not for
SGLang
Skip it if you want a hosted inference API you can hit with a credit card and zero ops.vLLM
Skip it if you don't run your own GPUs or you'd rather pay a managed inference provider than tune batching, parallelism, and KV cache yourself.Editorial score
SGLang
8.2 / 10vLLM
8.3 / 10Use cases
SGLang
llm-servingmultimodal-inferenceself-hostingopenai-compatible-apihigh-throughput-inference
vLLM
llm-servingself-hosted-inferenceopenai-api-replacementhigh-throughput-batchingmulti-gpu-deployment
Pros
SGLang
- State-of-the-art throughput via speculative decoding and disaggregated prefill/decode
- OpenAI-compatible endpoints make migration from hosted APIs trivial
- Broad hardware coverage: NVIDIA, AMD, TPU, Ascend, XPU, CPU
- Backed by real production users (NVIDIA, xAI, Oracle, LinkedIn)
- Fully open source under Apache 2.0
vLLM
- PagedAttention delivers industry-leading throughput on the same hardware
- Drop-in OpenAI-compatible API makes migration from hosted models trivial
- Broad hardware support spanning NVIDIA, AMD, Intel, TPU, and Neuron
- Apache-2.0, no per-token cost, no vendor lock-in
- Backed by Berkeley + major-cloud sponsors with very active release cadence
Cons
SGLang
- Self-hosted only; no managed inference offering
- Tuning for peak throughput requires real ML-infra expertise
- Documentation assumes you already know LLM-serving concepts
vLLM
- You provide and operate the GPUs; no managed offering
- Steep learning curve for tuning parallelism, quantization, and KV cache
- Bleeding-edge model support sometimes lags the model's release by days
- Multi-node deployment requires Ray or Kubernetes plumbing
Editorial score: rule-based, 0β10, from AI-assisted profile inputs (see /methodology) β not a user rating; βββ means unscored. βNot listedβ means we have no record of it, not that it is absent. GitHub figures and prices carry the date they were checked or captured; prices are shown as published, unconverted.
Pick SGLang if
- β State-of-the-art throughput via speculative decoding and disaggregated prefill/decode
- β OpenAI-compatible endpoints make migration from hosted APIs trivial
- β Broad hardware coverage: NVIDIA, AMD, TPU, Ascend, XPU, CPU
- β Backed by real production users (NVIDIA, xAI, Oracle, LinkedIn)
Pick vLLM if
- β PagedAttention delivers industry-leading throughput on the same hardware
- β Drop-in OpenAI-compatible API makes migration from hosted models trivial
- β Broad hardware support spanning NVIDIA, AMD, Intel, TPU, and Neuron
- β Apache-2.0, no per-token cost, no vendor lock-in