Notion MCP Server vs Obsidian MCP
A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.
Tagline
Notion MCP Server
The official Notion MCP server: give Claude, Cursor, and Copilot typed access to your Notion pages, databases, and comments.Obsidian MCP
A local Model Context Protocol server that lets MCP-compatible assistants safely read and modify explicitly configured Obsidian vaults.Pricing
Notion MCP Server
FreeΒ· Server is free and MIT-licensed; a paid Notion workspace is only required for features gated behind Notion's own plans. Notion tiers: Free / Plus $10 per user/mo / Business $18 per user/mo / Enterprise (custom).Obsidian MCP
FreeΒ· Free and open-source (MIT). No paid tiers; users only pay for their own Obsidian license if they choose Commercial/Sync/Publish add-ons.API
Notion MCP Server
YesObsidian MCP
Not listedOpen source
Notion MCP Server
Yes Β· MITObsidian MCP
Yes Β· MITGitHub stars
Notion MCP Server
4,686
checked 2026-10-29
Obsidian MCP
747
checked 2026-10-29
Last GitHub push
Notion MCP Server
2026-10-28Obsidian MCP
2026-10-08First commit
Notion MCP Server
2025-03Obsidian MCP
2024-12Package downloads (30 d)
Notion MCP Server
βObsidian MCP
13,558 Β· npm obsidian-mcp
checked 2026-10-17
Best for
Notion MCP Server
Teams already living in Notion who want Claude, Cursor, or Copilot to read specs, query project databases, draft pages, and leave comments through a standard MCP surface without building a custom API client.Obsidian MCP
βNot for
Notion MCP Server
Users who need OAuth-based per-user login rather than a shared integration token, or workflows that require destructive admin operations (deleting databases, bulk workspace migrations) not exposed by the server.Obsidian MCP
βEditorial score
Notion MCP Server
βObsidian MCP
βUse cases
Notion MCP Server
AI agent drafting weekly status reports into a Notion pageResearch assistant querying a projects database and appending findingsMeeting-notes pipeline inlining transcripts as Markdown blocksClaude Code reading a spec page and filing follow-up commentsCross-workspace search from a chat clientAutomated triage that comments on pages by title matchTemplate-driven page creation under a specified parentKnowledge-base RAG grounding pulled live from Notion pages
Obsidian MCP
Reading notes and retrieving their SHA-256 etagsCreating new notes atomically without overwriting existing contentSearching vault content, filenames, or tagsAdding tags to notes
Pros
Notion MCP Server
- Official and actively maintained by Notion, so the tool surface tracks the real API rather than a community reverse-engineering
- Markdown read/write endpoints make page editing dramatically more token-efficient than raw block JSON
- Runs via npx or Docker with no build step; wiring into Claude Desktop, Cursor, or Copilot CLI is a small JSON snippet
- Both stdio and streamable HTTP transports, with bearer-token auth and per-request token passthrough for multi-tenant hosting
- Permission scope is bounded by which pages you share with the integration in Notion, giving fine-grained blast-radius control
- MIT-licensed and easy to fork if you need custom tool shapes or additional guardrails
- Broad coverage: pages, blocks, data sources, comments, search, templates, and content moves
Obsidian MCP
- The server runs locally without listening on a network interface or sending telemetry.
- File mutations are journaled, conflict-checked, atomically replaced, and rolled back as a single transaction.
- The vendor says that all tool schemas are strict JSON Schema 2020-12 contracts generated from Zod.
- The server works directly with Markdown files, so the Obsidian application does not need to be running.
Cons
Notion MCP Server
- Internal-integration tokens are static secrets; there is no first-party OAuth flow in the local server yet (a remote OAuth version is hinted but not shipped)
- V2.0 dropped the old database_id tools in favour of data_source_id, so older agent prompts and any scripts that hard-coded the previous tool names need to be updated
- Intentionally omits destructive operations like deleting databases, which is safe but occasionally frustrating for cleanup workflows
- README itself flags a non-zero risk of exposing workspace data to an LLM; you need to think about read-only integrations for sensitive spaces
- Requires a per-page or per-database access grant in Notion for every resource the agent should see β easy to forget and a common cause of empty query results
- Rate limits, pagination quirks, and schema oddities are inherited from the underlying Notion API and are not smoothed over by the server
Obsidian MCP
- The server requires Node.js 22 or newer to run.
Editorial score: rule-based, 0β10, from AI-assisted profile inputs (see /methodology) β not a user rating; βββ means unscored. βNot listedβ means we have no record of it, not that it is absent. GitHub figures and prices carry the date they were checked or captured; prices are shown as published, unconverted.
Pick Notion MCP Server if
- β Official and actively maintained by Notion, so the tool surface tracks the real API rather than a community reverse-engineering
- β Markdown read/write endpoints make page editing dramatically more token-efficient than raw block JSON
- β Runs via npx or Docker with no build step; wiring into Claude Desktop, Cursor, or Copilot CLI is a small JSON snippet
- β Both stdio and streamable HTTP transports, with bearer-token auth and per-request token passthrough for multi-tenant hosting
Pick Obsidian MCP if
- β The server runs locally without listening on a network interface or sending telemetry.
- β File mutations are journaled, conflict-checked, atomically replaced, and rolled back as a single transaction.
- β The vendor says that all tool schemas are strict JSON Schema 2020-12 contracts generated from Zod.
- β The server works directly with Markdown files, so the Obsidian application does not need to be running.