LynxKite vs Stele
A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.
LynxKite Agents | Stele Agents | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | No-code AI orchestration platform built for graph-native pipelines in drug discovery and enterprise analytics. | Shared project memory for AI coding agents across Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, and Copilot |
| Category | Agents | Agents |
| Pricing | Enterprise· Contact sales; no public pricing | Freemium· Free: $0/ forever · Pro: $12/ month · Team: $20/ user / mo |
| Model | Multi-model (LLM agents + GNNs + NVIDIA BioNeMo) | — |
| Editorial score | 6.9 / 10 | — |
| Use cases | drug-discoverygraph-neural-networksknowledge-graphsai-workflow-orchestrationenterprise-ml-pipelines | shared memory across AI coding agentscross-tool project context handofftask queue for multi-agent workflowsagent onboarding from an existing codebasetracking failed refactor attemptscoordinating Claude Code and Cursor on one repoMCP-based agent memory backendarchitectural decision log for AI agents |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Website | lynxkite.com | stele-ai.dev |
Pick LynxKite if
- ✅ Graph-native: first-class GNNs and knowledge graphs, not bolted on
- ✅ GPU-accelerated via NVIDIA cuGraph and BioNeMo integrations
- ✅ No-code workflow builder usable by non-engineer domain experts
- ✅ Pre-built pharma pipelines shorten time to first model
Pick Stele if
- ✅ MCP-native, so it works with Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, and Copilot without per-tool adapters
- ✅ One-line CLI install with automatic onboarding from an existing repo
- ✅ Shared task queue prevents two agents from duplicating the same work
- ✅ Graph-based memory captures failed attempts, not just successful ones, so agents stop repeating dead ends