InfiBench vs LiveBench

A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.

Tagline

InfiBench

Stack Overflow-derived benchmark for evaluating code LLMs on real-world programming questions.

LiveBench

Contamination-free LLM benchmark that refreshes its questions monthly to keep frontier models honest.

Pricing

InfiBench

Free· Free and open source (CC BY-SA 4.0)

LiveBench

Free· Free and open source; self-hosted evaluation runner

Free trial

InfiBench

Yes

LiveBench

Yes

Platforms

InfiBench

linux

LiveBench

api

Open source

InfiBench

Yes

LiveBench

Yes

Model used

InfiBench

—

LiveBench

Multi-model

Best for

InfiBench

Pick InfiBench if you need a code-LLM benchmark that reflects messy real-world developer questions rather than clean function-completion tasks.

LiveBench

Pick LiveBench if you want a credible, contamination-resistant signal when comparing frontier LLMs or validating a fine-tune against a moving target.

Not for

InfiBench

Skip it if you want a hosted eval-as-a-service or a benchmark covering agentic, multi-file, or repo-scale coding tasks.

LiveBench

Skip it if you need a turnkey SaaS eval platform with hosted runs, custom datasets, and SLA support — this is a research benchmark, not a product.

Editorial score

InfiBench

6.9 / 10

LiveBench

8.2 / 10

Use cases

InfiBench

code-llm-evalmodel-benchmarkingleaderboard-comparisonresearch

LiveBench

llm-benchmarkingmodel-selectionreasoning-evalcoding-evalmath-evalleaderboard-tracking

Pros

InfiBench

234 real Stack Overflow questions across 15 languages, not synthetic toy prompts
Four complementary metrics handle free-form answers better than pass@k alone
Public leaderboard with 100+ evaluated models for direct comparison
Peer-reviewed at NeurIPS 2024 Datasets and Benchmarks Track

LiveBench

Monthly question refresh meaningfully blunts training-set contamination
Objective auto-scoring with ground truth, no LLM-judge bias
Covers six diverse domains including reasoning, code and math
Fully open source; reproduce scores or evaluate your own model
Cited by frontier labs, so scores travel in industry discussions

Cons

InfiBench

Linux-only harness with Hugging Face Transformers format requirement
Static 234-question set risks contamination as it ages
Research artifact, not a polished product — setup expects ML engineering comfort

LiveBench

No hosted API; you must run the eval harness yourself
Leaderboard UI is functional but spartan compared to commercial dashboards
Monthly cadence still leaves a window where recent questions can leak

Website

InfiBench

infi-coder.github.io

LiveBench

livebench.ai

Editorial score: rule-based, 0–10, from AI-assisted profile inputs (see /methodology) — not a user rating; “—” means unscored. “Not listed” means we have no record of it, not that it is absent. GitHub figures and prices carry the date they were checked or captured; prices are shown as published, unconverted.

Pick InfiBench if

✅ 234 real Stack Overflow questions across 15 languages, not synthetic toy prompts
✅ Four complementary metrics handle free-form answers better than pass@k alone
✅ Public leaderboard with 100+ evaluated models for direct comparison
✅ Peer-reviewed at NeurIPS 2024 Datasets and Benchmarks Track

Pick LiveBench if

✅ Monthly question refresh meaningfully blunts training-set contamination
✅ Objective auto-scoring with ground truth, no LLM-judge bias
✅ Covers six diverse domains including reasoning, code and math
✅ Fully open source; reproduce scores or evaluate your own model

Compare a different pair →