Horch vs Sesame
A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.
Horch Audio | Sesame Audio | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Privacy-first, on-device meeting assistant for macOS | Conversational voice AI aiming to cross the uncanny valley with context-aware, emotionally aware speech. |
| Category | Audio | Audio |
| Pricing | Paid· One-time purchase: €49 once | Free· Free research preview; consumer product pricing not announced |
| Model | Whisper (local) for transcription; optional Ollama / MLX local LLMs for summarization | Sesame CSM (1B / 3B / 8B) |
| Editorial score | — | 8.0 / 10 |
| Use cases | Confidential client meeting transcriptionAutomatic action-item extractionPer-contact relationship historyPre-meeting briefings from prior callsLocal Whisper transcription without cloud uploadFeeding meeting context into Claude or Cursor via MCPPersonal second-brain in MarkdownLegal, medical, or NDA-bound conversation notes | conversational-voicetext-to-speechvoice-agentsambient-ai |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Website | horch.app | www.sesame.com |
Pick Horch if
- ✅ Fully on-device by default — audio and transcripts never leave the Mac unless the user opts in
- ✅ One-time €49 purchase instead of a recurring per-seat SaaS bill
- ✅ Records at OS level so no bot appears in the meeting and any app (Zoom, Meet, Teams, in-person) works
- ✅ Notes stored as plain Markdown in ~/Meetings — portable, greppable, Obsidian-friendly
Pick Sesame if
- ✅ Open-source weights under Apache 2.0 for the CSM speech model
- ✅ Distinctly natural, context-aware prosody compared to typical TTS
- ✅ Backed by serious original research with published benchmarks
- ✅ Free research preview available at app.sesame.com