Graphiti vs Pathway
A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.
Graphiti RAG | Pathway RAG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Open-source temporal knowledge graph framework for building agent memory that updates in real time. | Live data framework for production RAG and streaming ETL pipelines in Python. |
| Category | RAG | RAG |
| Pricing | Freemium· Basic: $10 · Pro: $30 · Enterprise: $100 | Freemium· Community free (BSL 1.1, 8GB/4 cores); Scale and Enterprise tiers with license key |
| Model | Multi-model | Multi-model |
| Editorial score | 7.2 / 10 | 7.3 / 10 |
| Use cases | agent-memorytemporal-knowledge-graphshybrid-retrievallong-running-agentscontext-engineering | live-ragstreaming-etldocument-indexingmultimodal-raganomaly-detection |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Website | help.getzep.com | pathway.com |
Pick Graphiti if
- ✅ Real-time incremental graph updates without batch recomputation
- ✅ Temporal model tracks when facts were valid, not just current state
- ✅ Hybrid semantic + keyword + graph search out of the box
- ✅ Open source with an active commercial backer in Zep
Pick Pathway if
- ✅ Genuinely live indexing - documents update without rebuild jobs
- ✅ Self-hosted under BSL 1.1, no data leaves your infra
- ✅ Rich connector library (Kafka, S3, SharePoint, Postgres, Delta Lake)
- ✅ Same pipeline handles batch and streaming