Gorilla vs Izlo
A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.
Gorilla Agents | Izlo Agents | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Open-source LLM purpose-built for function calling and API invocation across thousands of tools. | Prompt management platform with version control, collaboration, and an API for production deployment. |
| Category | Agents | Agents |
| Pricing | Free· Free and Apache 2.0; self-hosted | Paid· Solo $20/mo; Pro $25/user/mo; Enterprise $39/user/mo |
| Model | gorilla-openfunctions-v2 (6.91B) | Model-agnostic |
| Editorial score | 7.3 / 10 | 6.9 / 10 |
| Use cases | function-callingtool-useapi-invocationagent-backbonerag-fine-tuning | prompt-managementversion-controlteam-collaborationprompt-testingproduction-deployment |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Website | gorilla.cs.berkeley.edu | getizlo.com |
Pick Gorilla if
- ✅ Fully open-source (Apache 2.0) with weights on HuggingFace
- ✅ Purpose-trained for function calling, not a generic chat model retrofitted
- ✅ Includes BFCL leaderboard as a public eval harness
- ✅ GoEX runtime adds undo and damage-confinement for executed actions
Pick Izlo if
- ✅ Git-style version history and activity log for every prompt change
- ✅ Remix sandbox isolates experiments from production prompts
- ✅ REST API lets you swap prompts without redeploying the app
- ✅ Built for multi-user team editing, not just solo developers