Firecrawl vs ScrapeGraphAI

Firecrawl

RAG

ScrapeGraphAI

Agents

Tagline

Firecrawl

Web scraping and crawling API that returns LLM-ready markdown, JSON, or structured data from any URL.

ScrapeGraphAI

LLM-driven web scraping API that turns natural-language prompts into structured JSON.

Pricing

Firecrawl

Freemium· Free Plan: $0 · Hobby: $16 · Standard: $83 · Growth: $333 · Scale: $599/monthly

ScrapeGraphAI

Freemium· Free 500 credits; Starter $20/mo, Growth $100/mo, Pro $500/mo, Enterprise custom

Lowest paid tier

Firecrawl

$16 · Hobby

captured 2026-08-10

ScrapeGraphAI

—

Free trial

Firecrawl

Yes

ScrapeGraphAI

Yes

API

Firecrawl

Yes

ScrapeGraphAI

Yes

Platforms

Firecrawl

apicli

ScrapeGraphAI

cliapi

Open source

Firecrawl

Yes · AGPL-3.0

ScrapeGraphAI

Yes · MIT

GitHub stars

Firecrawl

186,626

checked 2026-09-29

ScrapeGraphAI

31,423

checked 2026-09-29

Last GitHub push

Firecrawl

2026-09-29

ScrapeGraphAI

2026-09-25

First commit

Firecrawl

2024-04

ScrapeGraphAI

2024-01

Company

Firecrawl

—

ScrapeGraphAI

ScrapeGraphAI

Model used

Firecrawl

Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, OpenAI, Gemini

ScrapeGraphAI

Multi-model (LLM, unspecified)

Best for

Firecrawl

Pick Firecrawl if you are building a RAG pipeline or AI agent and want one API call to turn any URL into clean, token-efficient markdown.

ScrapeGraphAI

Pick ScrapeGraphAI if you're building agents or data pipelines that need fresh, structured data from messy or JS-heavy sites without maintaining selectors.

Not for

Firecrawl

Skip it if you only need to scrape a handful of static pages and a quick fetch+cheerio script would do, or if you have hard data-egress constraints.

ScrapeGraphAI

Skip it if you're doing high-volume scraping of well-structured pages where a traditional Playwright or Scrapy script will be cheaper and more predictable.

Editorial score

Firecrawl

8.0 / 10

ScrapeGraphAI

8.4 / 10

Use cases

Firecrawl

web-scrapingrag-ingestionagent-browsingsite-crawlingpdf-parsing

ScrapeGraphAI

web-scrapingdata-extractionprice-monitoringlead-generationagent-toolingsite-change-monitoring

Pros

Firecrawl

• Returns clean LLM-ready markdown/JSON without custom scraper code
• Handles JS rendering, anti-bot, and PDFs out of the box
• Open source with SDKs in six languages plus an MCP server
• Generous 1,000-credit free tier and predictable per-page pricing

ScrapeGraphAI

• Natural-language prompts replace fragile CSS/XPath selectors
• Handles JS rendering, SPAs, and proxies without setup
• Open-source core (27k+ GitHub stars) with managed API on top
• Official Python/JS SDKs plus MCP server for AI agents
• Crawl, Search, and Monitor endpoints beyond single-page scraping

Cons

Firecrawl

• Credit model gets expensive on million-URL crawls vs DIY scrapers
• Self-hosting is non-trivial compared with the managed API
• Browser interact actions burn credits quickly on long sessions

ScrapeGraphAI

• Underlying LLM provider isn't disclosed on the marketing site
• Credit-based pricing makes per-call cost hard to predict upfront
• Overkill for well-structured pages a 10-line scraper can handle
• Cloud service depends on prompt quality for reliable extraction

Website

Firecrawl

firecrawl.dev

ScrapeGraphAI

scrapegraphai.com

Editorial score: rule-based, 0–10, from AI-assisted profile inputs (see /methodology) — not a user rating; “—” means unscored. “Not listed” means we have no record of it, not that it is absent. GitHub figures and prices carry the date they were checked or captured; prices are shown as published, unconverted.