Cogram vs Izlo
A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.
Cogram Agents | Izlo Agents | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | AI assistant for architecture, engineering, and construction teams that automates meeting minutes, RFIs, field reports, and project correspondence. | Prompt management platform with version control, collaboration, and an API for production deployment. |
| Category | Agents | Agents |
| Pricing | Enterprise· Contact sales; guided free trial available | Paid· Solo $20/mo; Pro $25/user/mo; Enterprise $39/user/mo |
| Model | — | Model-agnostic |
| Editorial score | 6.9 / 10 | 6.9 / 10 |
| Use cases | meeting-minutesfield-reportsrfi-managementemail-triageconstruction-docs | prompt-managementversion-controlteam-collaborationprompt-testingproduction-deployment |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Website | cogram.com | getizlo.com |
Pick Cogram if
- ✅ Deep AEC focus with Procore, Deltek, Unanet and Autodesk integrations
- ✅ Covers meetings, email, RFIs, submittals and field reports in one product
- ✅ SOC 2 Type II with optional private-cloud or on-prem deployment
- ✅ Explicit no-training-on-customer-data policy
Pick Izlo if
- ✅ Git-style version history and activity log for every prompt change
- ✅ Remix sandbox isolates experiments from production prompts
- ✅ REST API lets you swap prompts without redeploying the app
- ✅ Built for multi-user team editing, not just solo developers