Cognee vs Pathway
A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.
Cognee RAG | Pathway RAG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Open-source graph-memory layer that gives AI agents persistent, queryable context across sessions. | Live data framework for production RAG and streaming ETL pipelines in Python. |
| Category | RAG | RAG |
| Pricing | Freemium· Hobby free (1M tokens/mo); Growth $5/workspace/mo + token usage; Enterprise custom | Freemium· Community free (BSL 1.1, 8GB/4 cores); Scale and Enterprise tiers with license key |
| Model | Multi-model (Claude, OpenAI, others) | Multi-model |
| Editorial score | 7.2 / 10 | 7.3 / 10 |
| Use cases | agent-memoryknowledge-graphsragmulti-agent-systemssecond-braincontext-retrieval | live-ragstreaming-etldocument-indexingmultimodal-raganomaly-detection |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Website | www.cognee.ai | pathway.com |
Pick Cognee if
- ✅ Open source and self-hostable with a sizable GitHub community
- ✅ Graph-based memory beats flat vector RAG for entity-heavy domains
- ✅ MCP server makes it easy to plug into Claude Desktop and agent frameworks
- ✅ Generous free tier (1M tokens/month) for experimentation
Pick Pathway if
- ✅ Genuinely live indexing - documents update without rebuild jobs
- ✅ Self-hosted under BSL 1.1, no data leaves your infra
- ✅ Rich connector library (Kafka, S3, SharePoint, Postgres, Delta Lake)
- ✅ Same pipeline handles batch and streaming