Pathway vs Quivr
A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.
Pathway RAG | Quivr RAG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Live data framework for production RAG and streaming ETL pipelines in Python. | Open-source RAG framework for building custom AI assistants over your own documents in a few lines of Python. |
| Category | RAG | RAG |
| Pricing | Freemium· Community free (BSL 1.1, 8GB/4 cores); Scale and Enterprise tiers with license key | Free· Open source (pip install quivr-core); pay only for LLM/vector-store usage |
| Model | Multi-model | Multi-model (OpenAI, Anthropic, Mistral, Gemma) |
| Editorial score | 7.3 / 10 | 8.4 / 10 |
| Use cases | live-ragstreaming-etldocument-indexingmultimodal-raganomaly-detection | document-qacustom-knowledge-baserag-pipelineinternal-assistantschat-with-pdf |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Website | pathway.com | core.quivr.com |
Pick Pathway if
- ✅ Genuinely live indexing - documents update without rebuild jobs
- ✅ Self-hosted under BSL 1.1, no data leaves your infra
- ✅ Rich connector library (Kafka, S3, SharePoint, Postgres, Delta Lake)
- ✅ Same pipeline handles batch and streaming
Pick Quivr if
- ✅ Genuinely open source and pip-installable, no vendor lock-in
- ✅ Model-agnostic: OpenAI, Anthropic, Mistral, and Gemma supported
- ✅ Minimal boilerplate to get a working RAG assistant running
- ✅ Pairs with Megaparse for tougher PDF and document ingestion