LlamaIndex vs PrivateGPT
A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.
LlamaIndex RAG | PrivateGPT RAG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Data framework for connecting LLMs to your data. | Production-ready, air-gapped RAG framework for querying your documents with local LLMs. |
| Category | RAG | RAG |
| Pricing | Freemium· Free open-source; LlamaCloud paid | Freemium· OSS free; Zylon enterprise contract (contact sales) |
| Model | BYO (Claude / GPT / open) | Multi-model (BYO local LLM) |
| Editorial score | 8.7 / 10 | — |
| Use cases | RAGdata ingestionindexing | private-ragchat-with-documentson-premises-llmair-gapped-aienterprise-knowledge-base |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Website | www.llamaindex.ai | www.zylon.ai |
Pick LlamaIndex if
- ✅ Focused on retrieval (not general agent stuff)
- ✅ Many ingestion connectors
- ✅ Strong production patterns
- ✅ LlamaCloud for managed ingestion
Pick PrivateGPT if
- ✅ Fully local and air-gapped; data never leaves your infrastructure
- ✅ OpenAI-compatible API makes integration straightforward
- ✅ Massive OSS community (57k+ stars) with proven deployments
- ✅ Model-agnostic across llama.cpp, Ollama, vLLM, and Qdrant