LangGraph vs Stele
A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.
LangGraph Agents | Stele Agents | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Stateful, graph-based agent orchestration from LangChain. | Shared project memory for AI coding agents across Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, and Copilot |
| Category | Agents | Agents |
| Pricing | Freemium· Developer: $0 / seat per month · Plus: $39 / seat per month · Enterprise: Custom pricing | Freemium· Free forever plan (unlimited public projects, 1 private project, monthly assistant allowance); paid tiers for additional private projects |
| Model | BYO (Claude / GPT / open) | — |
| Editorial score | 8.8 / 10 | — |
| Use cases | stateful agentshuman-in-loopproduction | shared memory across AI coding agentscross-tool project context handofftask queue for multi-agent workflowsagent onboarding from an existing codebasetracking failed refactor attemptscoordinating Claude Code and Cursor on one repoMCP-based agent memory backendarchitectural decision log for AI agents |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Website | www.langchain.com | stele-ai.dev |
Pick LangGraph if
- ✅ Reliable, debuggable agent graphs
- ✅ Built-in persistence + HITL
- ✅ Production-grade
- ✅ Tight LangSmith integration
Pick Stele if
- ✅ MCP-native, so it works with Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, and Copilot without per-tool adapters
- ✅ One-line CLI install with automatic onboarding from an existing repo
- ✅ Shared task queue prevents two agents from duplicating the same work
- ✅ Graph-based memory captures failed attempts, not just successful ones, so agents stop repeating dead ends