LangGraph vs Semantic Kernel
A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.
LangGraph Agents | Semantic Kernel Agents | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Stateful, graph-based agent orchestration from LangChain. | Microsoft's open-source SDK for wiring LLMs, plugins, and agents into enterprise .NET, Python, and Java apps. |
| Category | Agents | Agents |
| Pricing | Freemium· Free open-source; LangGraph Platform paid | Free· Free, MIT-licensed SDK; you pay for the underlying model APIs |
| Model | BYO (Claude / GPT / open) | Multi-model |
| Editorial score | 8.8 / 10 | — |
| Use cases | stateful agentshuman-in-loopproduction | agent-orchestrationllm-pluginsrag-pipelinesenterprise-aimulti-agent-workflows |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Website | www.langchain.com | learn.microsoft.com |
Pick LangGraph if
- ✅ Reliable, debuggable agent graphs
- ✅ Built-in persistence + HITL
- ✅ Production-grade
- ✅ Tight LangSmith integration
Pick Semantic Kernel if
- ✅ First-class C#, Python, and Java SDKs, rare among agent frameworks
- ✅ Open source (MIT) and backed by Microsoft with active roadmap
- ✅ Deep Azure OpenAI, Azure AI Search, and Cosmos DB integrations
- ✅ Built-in filters, telemetry, and DI patterns suited to enterprise apps