Skip to main content
📖 The AI Tool Bible

LangGraph vs Mastra

A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.

 LangGraph logo
LangGraph
Agents
Mastra logo
Mastra
Agents
TaglineStateful, graph-based agent orchestration from LangChain.Open-source TypeScript framework for building, deploying, and observing AI agents and workflows.
CategoryAgentsAgents
PricingFreemium· Developer: $0 / seat · Plus: $39 / seat · Enterprise: Custom pricingFreemium· Starter: $0 · Teams: $250 · Enterprise: Custom pricing
ModelBYO (Claude / GPT / open)Multi-model (90+ providers)
Editorial score8.8 / 108.1 / 10
Use cases
stateful agentshuman-in-loopproduction
ai-agentsworkflow-orchestrationragcopilotsmcp-serversagent-observability
Pros
  • Reliable, debuggable agent graphs
  • Built-in persistence + HITL
  • Production-grade
  • Tight LangSmith integration
  • TypeScript-native, fits cleanly into Next.js/Node stacks
  • Apache 2.0 core with no seat or usage limits
  • Built-in evals, traces, and metrics for agent observability
  • Model router across 90+ LLM providers
  • First-class MCP server support
Cons
  • Steeper learning curve than CrewAI
  • Verbose to set up
  • TypeScript only; Python shops will look elsewhere
  • Younger ecosystem than LangChain/LlamaIndex
  • Enterprise features are source-available, not OSS
Websitewww.langchain.commastra.ai
Pick LangGraph if
  • ✅ Reliable, debuggable agent graphs
  • ✅ Built-in persistence + HITL
  • ✅ Production-grade
  • ✅ Tight LangSmith integration
Pick Mastra if
  • ✅ TypeScript-native, fits cleanly into Next.js/Node stacks
  • ✅ Apache 2.0 core with no seat or usage limits
  • ✅ Built-in evals, traces, and metrics for agent observability
  • ✅ Model router across 90+ LLM providers
Compare a different pair →