Izlo vs ScrapeGraphAI
A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.
Izlo Agents | ScrapeGraphAI Agents | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Prompt management platform with version control, collaboration, and an API for production deployment. | LLM-driven web scraping API that turns natural-language prompts into structured JSON. |
| Category | Agents | Agents |
| Pricing | Paid· Solo $20/mo; Pro $25/user/mo; Enterprise $39/user/mo | Freemium· Free 500 credits; Starter $20/mo, Growth $100/mo, Pro $500/mo, Enterprise custom |
| Model | Model-agnostic | Multi-model (LLM, unspecified) |
| Editorial score | 6.9 / 10 | 8.4 / 10 |
| Use cases | prompt-managementversion-controlteam-collaborationprompt-testingproduction-deployment | web-scrapingdata-extractionprice-monitoringlead-generationagent-toolingsite-change-monitoring |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Website | getizlo.com | scrapegraphai.com |
Pick Izlo if
- ✅ Git-style version history and activity log for every prompt change
- ✅ Remix sandbox isolates experiments from production prompts
- ✅ REST API lets you swap prompts without redeploying the app
- ✅ Built for multi-user team editing, not just solo developers
Pick ScrapeGraphAI if
- ✅ Natural-language prompts replace fragile CSS/XPath selectors
- ✅ Handles JS rendering, SPAs, and proxies without setup
- ✅ Open-source core (27k+ GitHub stars) with managed API on top
- ✅ Official Python/JS SDKs plus MCP server for AI agents