Izlo vs Kong AI Gateway
A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.
Izlo Agents | Kong AI Gateway Agents | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Prompt management platform with version control, collaboration, and an API for production deployment. | Enterprise API gateway extended to route, govern, and observe LLM and agent traffic across providers. |
| Category | Agents | Agents |
| Pricing | Paid· Solo $20/mo; Pro $25/user/mo; Enterprise $39/user/mo | Freemium· OSS free; Konnect usage-based; Enterprise quote-only |
| Model | Model-agnostic | Multi-model |
| Editorial score | 6.9 / 10 | 7.3 / 10 |
| Use cases | prompt-managementversion-controlteam-collaborationprompt-testingproduction-deployment | llm-gatewaymulti-llm-routingai-observabilityprompt-guardrailsmcp-governancetoken-quotas |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Website | getizlo.com | konghq.com |
Pick Izlo if
- ✅ Git-style version history and activity log for every prompt change
- ✅ Remix sandbox isolates experiments from production prompts
- ✅ REST API lets you swap prompts without redeploying the app
- ✅ Built for multi-user team editing, not just solo developers
Pick Kong AI Gateway if
- ✅ Unified proxy for 20+ LLM providers with drop-in OpenAI-compatible API
- ✅ Mature gateway runtime with rate-limiting, caching, auth, and observability baked in
- ✅ Self-hostable OSS core; no hard dependency on a SaaS control plane
- ✅ First-class MCP and agent-to-agent traffic management