Horch vs Voicebox
A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.
Horch Audio | Voicebox Audio | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Privacy-first, on-device meeting assistant for macOS | Open-source desktop voice studio for local cloning, dictation, and giving MCP agents a voice. |
| Category | Audio | Audio |
| Pricing | Paid· One-time purchase: €49 once | Free· Free and open source; optional $VOICEBOX token donations |
| Model | Whisper (local) for transcription; optional Ollama / MLX local LLMs for summarization | Multi-model (Chatterbox, Qwen TTS, Whisper, etc.) |
| Editorial score | — | 7.4 / 10 |
| Use cases | Confidential client meeting transcriptionAutomatic action-item extractionPer-contact relationship historyPre-meeting briefings from prior callsLocal Whisper transcription without cloud uploadFeeding meeting context into Claude or Cursor via MCPPersonal second-brain in MarkdownLegal, medical, or NDA-bound conversation notes | voice-cloningtext-to-speechdictationagent-voicesmulti-voice-narration |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Website | horch.app | voicebox.sh |
Pick Horch if
- ✅ Fully on-device by default — audio and transcripts never leave the Mac unless the user opts in
- ✅ One-time €49 purchase instead of a recurring per-seat SaaS bill
- ✅ Records at OS level so no bot appears in the meeting and any app (Zoom, Meet, Teams, in-person) works
- ✅ Notes stored as plain Markdown in ~/Meetings — portable, greppable, Obsidian-friendly
Pick Voicebox if
- ✅ Fully local inference on Metal, CUDA, ROCm, Intel Arc, or DirectML
- ✅ Clones a voice from as little as 3 seconds of audio
- ✅ MCP server lets Claude Code, Cursor, Cline speak in cloned voices
- ✅ Bundles seven TTS engines, Whisper dictation, and a multi-track editor