HelixDB vs Pathway
A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.
HelixDB RAG | Pathway RAG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Unified graph-and-vector database built for AI agent memory and GraphRAG. | Live data framework for production RAG and streaming ETL pipelines in Python. |
| Category | RAG | RAG |
| Pricing | Freemium· GW-10: $86.87 · GW-20: $173.74 · GW-40: $348.21 · GW-80: $696.42 · GW-160: $1,392.84 | Freemium· Community free (BSL 1.1, 8GB/4 cores); Scale and Enterprise tiers with license key |
| Model | — | Multi-model |
| Editorial score | 7.0 / 10 | 7.3 / 10 |
| Use cases | agent-memorygraphragvector-searchknowledge-graphenterprise-knowledge | live-ragstreaming-etldocument-indexingmultimodal-raganomaly-detection |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Website | helix-db.com | pathway.com |
Pick HelixDB if
- ✅ Unifies graph, vector, and full-text search in one query layer
- ✅ Object-storage backend keeps costs and ops overhead lower than hot-memory stores
- ✅ Open source with SDKs in Rust, Go, TypeScript, and Python
- ✅ Temporal awareness for facts that change over time, useful for agent memory
Pick Pathway if
- ✅ Genuinely live indexing - documents update without rebuild jobs
- ✅ Self-hosted under BSL 1.1, no data leaves your infra
- ✅ Rich connector library (Kafka, S3, SharePoint, Postgres, Delta Lake)
- ✅ Same pipeline handles batch and streaming