Habibi vs LangSmith
A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.
Habibi Evaluation | LangSmith Evaluation | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Self-hosted generative engine optimization for tracking brand mentions across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini | LangChain's eval + observability platform. |
| Category | Evaluation | Evaluation |
| Pricing | Freemium· Self-host free under the Sustainable Use License; deploy via Opsily starting at $20/month for the underlying server (no separate Habibi seat fees). Users bring their own OpenAI, Perplexity, and Google API keys, which are billed separately by those providers. | Freemium· Free starter; Plus $39/mo per seat |
| Model | GPT-4o, Perplexity Sonar, Gemini (bring-your-own API keys) | Platform (any LLM) |
| Editorial score | — | 8.7 / 10 |
| Use cases | AI answer engine visibility trackingChatGPT brand mention monitoringPerplexity citation trackingGemini share-of-voice reportingCompetitor GEO benchmarkingPage-level citation mappingClient-facing GEO reporting for agenciesGDPR-compliant AI visibility monitoringPrompt-library A/B testing for content changes | LLM tracingevalsLangChain integration |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Website | opsily.com | www.langchain.com |
Pick Habibi if
- ✅ Self-hosted with data kept in a local SQLite database, so prompt libraries and competitor lists never leave your infrastructure
- ✅ Flat server-based pricing (from about $20/month via Opsily) instead of per-seat SaaS fees that typically run $99-$579/month
- ✅ Unlimited team seats at no extra cost, which suits agencies managing many client workspaces
- ✅ Multi-sample runs per prompt smooth out LLM non-determinism and give more trustworthy mention-rate numbers
Pick LangSmith if
- ✅ Tight LangChain integration
- ✅ Strong tracing UX
- ✅ Mature dataset/eval flows
- ✅ Reasonable per-seat pricing