GradGPT vs STORM
A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.
GradGPT Writing | STORM Writing | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | AI essay coach that scores and red-flags college application drafts against admissions rubrics. | Stanford's open-source research agent that turns a topic into a Wikipedia-style article with citations. |
| Category | Writing | Writing |
| Pricing | Freemium· Free plan: $0 · GradGPT Plus yearly: $12/month · GradGPT Plus monthly: $36/month | Free· Hosted demo free; self-host open-source (pay your own LLM/search API) |
| Model | — | Multi-model (via LiteLLM) |
| Editorial score | 6.8 / 10 | 7.5 / 10 |
| Use cases | college-essay-feedbackadmissions-prepcommon-app-essaysap-test-practicecollege-matching | long-form researchwikipedia-style articlesliterature reviewtopic synthesisgrounded report writing |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Website | gradgpt.com | storm.genie.stanford.edu |
Pick GradGPT if
- ✅ Cheaper than a human admissions consultant for the same iteration loop
- ✅ Rubric-based scoring grounded in real admit benchmarks
- ✅ Free access path for low-income and Title I students
- ✅ Covers the full app: essays, activities, AP prep, college match
Pick STORM if
- ✅ Genuinely open source (MIT) and model-agnostic via LiteLLM
- ✅ Produces structured, cited reports rather than freeform prose
- ✅ Co-STORM adds human-in-the-loop collaboration with a mind map
- ✅ Pluggable retrievers including a local VectorRM for private docs