Google Agent Development Kit (ADK) vs TeamoRouter

A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.

	Google Agent Development Kit (ADK) Agents	TeamoRouter Agents
Tagline	Google's open-source framework for building, evaluating, and deploying production AI agents	Unified LLM gateway that brokers Claude, GPT, and Gemini through one API key with usage-based discounts.
Category	Agents	Agents
Pricing	Free· Framework itself is free and open-source (Apache 2.0). Costs come from the underlying model provider (e.g. Gemini API / Vertex AI usage) and any hosting infrastructure (Cloud Run, GKE, Agent Engine).	Paid· Pay-as-you-go; rates from ~10% of model list price, avg ~19% hourly discount
Model	Gemini (default) plus Claude, GPT-4/5, Llama, and other providers via LiteLLM	Multi-model
Editorial score	—	7.0 / 10
Use cases	Multi-agent research assistantCustomer support triage agentRAG chatbot backed by Vertex AI SearchCode review and refactoring agentBigQuery natural-language analytics agentDocument processing pipelineVoice/streaming conversational agentInternal tool-use agent orchestrating APIsEvaluation and regression testing of LLM workflowsEnterprise workflow automation on Agent Engine	llm-routingmulti-model-accessagent-infrastructurecost-optimizationclaude-code-proxy
Pros	Genuinely open-source (Apache 2.0) with active Google engineering behind it, not a hosted-only product Multi-language: first-class Python, Java, and Go SDKs — rare among agent frameworks that are usually Python-only Built-in dev UI (`adk web`) with trace inspection, event stream, and session replay speeds up debugging enormously Model-agnostic via LiteLLM — Gemini is default but Claude, GPT, and local models plug in cleanly Rich multi-agent primitives out of the box: SequentialAgent, ParallelAgent, LoopAgent, and hierarchical sub-agents Tight Google Cloud integration for deployment (Cloud Run, GKE, Agent Engine) plus native BigQuery/Vertex Search tools Evaluation harness with trajectory-level scoring is included, not a separate paid add-on First-class MCP (Model Context Protocol) client and server support	Single API key for Claude, GPT-5.x, and Gemini families Aggressive pricing with hourly real-time discounts versus list rates Agent-protocol aware; targets Claude Code and Codex Desktop users High prompt-cache hit rate (>99% claimed) and multi-region routing
Cons	Documentation and examples lean heavily on Gemini + Google Cloud; non-Google paths work but feel like second-class citizens API surface is still evolving — breaking changes between minor versions have been common through 2025-2026 Multi-agent orchestration primitives are powerful but the graph/callback model has a real learning curve compared to a plain prompt loop Agent Engine deployment is convenient but locks you into GCP billing and quotas TypeScript/Kotlin support lags the Python SDK in features and community examples	Newer, smaller player versus established gateways like OpenRouter Opaque routing can swap upstream channels mid-workload Sending prompts through a third party adds a privacy/compliance hop SLA and uptime claims not independently verifiable on the marketing page
Website	google.github.io	teamorouter.com

Pick Google Agent Development Kit (ADK) if

✅ Genuinely open-source (Apache 2.0) with active Google engineering behind it, not a hosted-only product
✅ Multi-language: first-class Python, Java, and Go SDKs — rare among agent frameworks that are usually Python-only
✅ Built-in dev UI (`adk web`) with trace inspection, event stream, and session replay speeds up debugging enormously
✅ Model-agnostic via LiteLLM — Gemini is default but Claude, GPT, and local models plug in cleanly

Pick TeamoRouter if

✅ Single API key for Claude, GPT-5.x, and Gemini families
✅ Aggressive pricing with hourly real-time discounts versus list rates
✅ Agent-protocol aware; targets Claude Code and Codex Desktop users
✅ High prompt-cache hit rate (>99% claimed) and multi-region routing

Compare a different pair →