Fish Audio vs Suno
A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.
Fish Audio Audio | Suno Audio | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Expressive, emotion-controllable text-to-speech and voice cloning with an open-model heritage | Text-to-song AI — full vocal tracks from a prompt. |
| Category | Audio | Audio |
| Pricing | Freemium· Free tier with monthly generation limits (personal, non-commercial); paid subscription plans for commercial licensing; pay-as-you-go API pricing for developers. Exact tier prices are gated behind sign-in and shift with promotional discounts (a 50% anniversary offer was live at time of review). | Freemium· Free credits; Pro $10/mo; Premier $30/mo |
| Model | Fish Audio S2.1 Pro (in-house); S1 and S2 checkpoints open-sourced | Suno v4 |
| Editorial score | — | 9.2 / 10 |
| Use cases | YouTube video voiceoverAudiobook narrationGame and animation character voicesCustomer support voice botsIVR and phone agentsAccessibility text-to-speechPodcast intro and ad readsReal-time streaming voice agentsInstant voice cloning for personal avatarsMultilingual dubbing | songwritingdemosbackground music |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Website | fish.audio | suno.com |
Pick Fish Audio if
- ✅ Emotion-tag control system ([angry], [whispering], [laughing], [pause]) gives fine prosodic steering that most TTS APIs lack
- ✅ Instant voice cloning from ~10-15 seconds of reference audio
- ✅ Voice Library of 2M+ community voices to browse instead of training your own
- ✅ 30+ language coverage across the same models
Pick Suno if
- ✅ Astonishing vocal quality
- ✅ Wide genre range
- ✅ Fast to iterate
- ✅ Lyric + instrumental generation in one tool