Firecrawl vs Pathway
A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.
Firecrawl RAG | Pathway RAG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Web scraping and crawling API that returns LLM-ready markdown, JSON, or structured data from any URL. | Live data framework for production RAG and streaming ETL pipelines in Python. |
| Category | RAG | RAG |
| Pricing | Freemium· Free Plan: $0 · Hobby: $16 · Standard: $83 · Growth: $333 · Scale: $599/monthly | Freemium· Community free (BSL 1.1, 8GB/4 cores); Scale and Enterprise tiers with license key |
| Model | Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, OpenAI, Gemini | Multi-model |
| Editorial score | 8.0 / 10 | 7.3 / 10 |
| Use cases | web-scrapingrag-ingestionagent-browsingsite-crawlingpdf-parsing | live-ragstreaming-etldocument-indexingmultimodal-raganomaly-detection |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Website | firecrawl.dev | pathway.com |
Pick Firecrawl if
- ✅ Returns clean LLM-ready markdown/JSON without custom scraper code
- ✅ Handles JS rendering, anti-bot, and PDFs out of the box
- ✅ Open source with SDKs in six languages plus an MCP server
- ✅ Generous 1,000-credit free tier and predictable per-page pricing
Pick Pathway if
- ✅ Genuinely live indexing - documents update without rebuild jobs
- ✅ Self-hosted under BSL 1.1, no data leaves your infra
- ✅ Rich connector library (Kafka, S3, SharePoint, Postgres, Delta Lake)
- ✅ Same pipeline handles batch and streaming