Cursor vs Same.new

A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.

	Cursor Coding	Same.new Coding
Tagline	AI-first VS Code fork — chat, edit, and agentic coding in one IDE.	Prompt-first AI web app builder that turns a URL or description into a live, hosted full-stack app.
Category	Coding	Coding
Pricing	Freemium· Free hobby; Pro $20/mo; Business $40/mo	Freemium· Free (500K tokens/mo) / Basic $10/mo (2M tokens) / Pro $25/mo (5M tokens) / Max $50/mo (10M tokens) / Ultra $100/mo (20M tokens, $10 per additional 2M overage). Tokens do not roll over.
Model	Claude / GPT (configurable)	Undisclosed premium frontier models (paid tiers)
Editorial score	9.5 / 10	—
Use cases	codingrefactorsagentic editsIDE	Cloning a reference site's UI as a starting templatePrototyping SaaS onboarding flowsBuilding landing pages for client reviewSpinning up internal tools and calculatorsRebuilding legacy marketing sites on a modern stackGenerating MVPs with auth and database wired inProducing shareable hosted demos for user testingRemixing an existing app into variant designs
Pros	Best-in-class multi-file edits Choice of underlying models Composer agent is genuinely useful Tab completion is faster than Copilot	Fast path from prompt or URL to a live hosted preview URL, ideal for client demos and stakeholder reviews Can clone existing sites from a URL or screenshot as a starting point rather than starting from a blank canvas Real full-stack integrations (Supabase, Neon, Clerk, GitHub) instead of throwaway static output Generous free tier (500K tokens/mo) makes evaluation genuinely possible without a card Project download and GitHub push means you own the code and can graduate off the platform Remix capability on paid tiers is useful for iterating on multiple variants of the same app
Cons	Heavier than vanilla VS Code Pricing creeping up Some extensions lag VS Code	Token-metered pricing gets expensive quickly on heavy iteration or multi-contributor projects, and unused tokens expire monthly Generated code quality is variable — production hardening, accessibility, and test coverage still need a human pass Cloning existing sites from a URL raises obvious IP and design-attribution questions the product does not police for you Less mature ecosystem than incumbents like Lovable, v0 or Bolt — fewer templates, integrations and community examples Underlying model choice is opaque; 'premium models' behind paid tiers are not clearly named on the pricing page
Website	cursor.com	same.new

Pick Cursor if

✅ Best-in-class multi-file edits
✅ Choice of underlying models
✅ Composer agent is genuinely useful
✅ Tab completion is faster than Copilot

Pick Same.new if

✅ Fast path from prompt or URL to a live hosted preview URL, ideal for client demos and stakeholder reviews
✅ Can clone existing sites from a URL or screenshot as a starting point rather than starting from a blank canvas
✅ Real full-stack integrations (Supabase, Neon, Clerk, GitHub) instead of throwaway static output
✅ Generous free tier (500K tokens/mo) makes evaluation genuinely possible without a card

Compare a different pair →