Cursor vs Pieces
A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.
Cursor Coding | Pieces Coding | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | AI-first VS Code fork — chat, edit, and agentic coding in one IDE. | On-device long-term memory layer that feeds your last nine months of work context into any LLM or IDE assistant. |
| Category | Coding | Coding |
| Pricing | Freemium· Free hobby; Pro $20/mo; Business $40/mo | Freemium· Individual free; Teams contact sales |
| Model | Claude / GPT (configurable) | Multi-model (BYO OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Ollama) |
| Editorial score | 9.5 / 10 | — |
| Use cases | codingrefactorsagentic editsIDE | developer-memorycode-snippetsmeeting-contextide-assistantmcp-integration |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Website | cursor.com | pieces.app |
Pick Cursor if
- ✅ Best-in-class multi-file edits
- ✅ Choice of underlying models
- ✅ Composer agent is genuinely useful
- ✅ Tab completion is faster than Copilot
Pick Pieces if
- ✅ Local-first capture keeps sensitive code and meetings off third-party servers by default
- ✅ Nine-month LTM-2 memory bridges multiple AI assistants via MCP
- ✅ Bring-your-own-key support for OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, and local Ollama models
- ✅ Free Individual tier includes the full memory window and all major plugins