Cursor vs pgMagic
A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.
Cursor Coding | pgMagic Coding | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | AI-first VS Code fork — chat, edit, and agentic coding in one IDE. | Mac desktop client that lets you chat with your Postgres database in natural language using your own OpenAI key. |
| Category | Coding | Coding |
| Pricing | Freemium· Free hobby; Pro $20/mo; Business $40/mo | Paid· AU$22 one-time license; bring your own OpenAI API key |
| Model | Claude / GPT (configurable) | OpenAI (user-supplied API key) |
| Editorial score | 9.5 / 10 | — |
| Use cases | codingrefactorsagentic editsIDE | natural-language-to-sqlpostgres-clientschema-explorationsql-autocompletead-hoc-querying |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Website | cursor.com | pgmagic.app |
Pick Cursor if
- ✅ Best-in-class multi-file edits
- ✅ Choice of underlying models
- ✅ Composer agent is genuinely useful
- ✅ Tab completion is faster than Copilot
Pick pgMagic if
- ✅ One-time AU$22 license instead of a subscription
- ✅ BYO OpenAI key means no per-query markup from the vendor
- ✅ Native Mac client with schema-aware SQL autocomplete and highlighting
- ✅ Runs locally; only the LLM call leaves your machine