CrewAI vs Stele
A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.
CrewAI Agents | Stele Agents | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Python framework for multi-agent orchestration. | Shared project memory for AI coding agents across Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, and Copilot |
| Category | Agents | Agents |
| Pricing | Freemium· Basic: Free · Enterprise: Custom | Freemium· Free forever plan (unlimited public projects, 1 private project, monthly assistant allowance); paid tiers for additional private projects |
| Model | BYO (Claude / GPT / open) | — |
| Editorial score | 8.4 / 10 | — |
| Use cases | multi-agentorchestrationPython | shared memory across AI coding agentscross-tool project context handofftask queue for multi-agent workflowsagent onboarding from an existing codebasetracking failed refactor attemptscoordinating Claude Code and Cursor on one repoMCP-based agent memory backendarchitectural decision log for AI agents |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Website | www.crewai.com | stele-ai.dev |
Pick CrewAI if
- ✅ Clean Python API
- ✅ Strong role/goal abstractions
- ✅ Active community
- ✅ Hosted platform for deployment
Pick Stele if
- ✅ MCP-native, so it works with Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, and Copilot without per-tool adapters
- ✅ One-line CLI install with automatic onboarding from an existing repo
- ✅ Shared task queue prevents two agents from duplicating the same work
- ✅ Graph-based memory captures failed attempts, not just successful ones, so agents stop repeating dead ends