Count vs LangGraph
A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.
Count Agents | LangGraph Agents | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Collaborative AI-powered data canvas that blends SQL, Python, and natural-language agents for team analytics. | Stateful, graph-based agent orchestration from LangChain. |
| Category | Agents | Agents |
| Pricing | Freemium· Free; Pro $49/editor/mo; Scale $69/editor/mo (15-seat min); Enterprise custom | Freemium· Free open-source; LangGraph Platform paid |
| Model | Multi-model (Anthropic, OpenAI, Google) | BYO (Claude / GPT / open) |
| Editorial score | — | 8.8 / 10 |
| Use cases | collaborative-analyticsai-data-explorationself-serve-bimetric-modelingsql-notebooks | stateful agentshuman-in-loopproduction |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Website | count.co | www.langchain.com |
Pick Count if
- ✅ Canvas model keeps AI work auditable rather than locked in chat threads
- ✅ Unlimited viewer seats make org-wide rollout affordable
- ✅ MCP and API support for connecting warehouses and external tools
- ✅ Mixes SQL, Python, and agent prompts in a single workspace
Pick LangGraph if
- ✅ Reliable, debuggable agent graphs
- ✅ Built-in persistence + HITL
- ✅ Production-grade
- ✅ Tight LangSmith integration