ChatPDF vs LlamaIndex
A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.
ChatPDF RAG | LlamaIndex RAG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Conversational Q&A over PDFs and other documents with citation-backed answers. | Data framework for connecting LLMs to your data. |
| Category | RAG | RAG |
| Pricing | Freemium· Free: 2 PDFs/day; Plus plan for unlimited | Freemium· Free open-source; LlamaCloud paid |
| Model | GPT-4o / GPT-4o-mini | BYO (Claude / GPT / open) |
| Editorial score | — | 8.7 / 10 |
| Use cases | pdf-qadocument-summarizationresearchcontract-reviewstudy-aid | RAGdata ingestionindexing |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Website | chatpdf.com | www.llamaindex.ai |
Pick ChatPDF if
- ✅ Citations link back to the exact page in the source document
- ✅ Free tier works with no signup for casual use
- ✅ Supports PDFs, Word, PowerPoint, and text plus multi-doc folders
- ✅ Public API for embedding into other products
Pick LlamaIndex if
- ✅ Focused on retrieval (not general agent stuff)
- ✅ Many ingestion connectors
- ✅ Strong production patterns
- ✅ LlamaCloud for managed ingestion