Augment Code vs CrewAI

A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.

	Augment Code Agents	CrewAI Agents
Tagline	Enterprise agent-orchestration platform for the software development lifecycle.	Python framework for multi-agent orchestration.
Category	Agents	Agents
Pricing	Paid· Business $100/mo flat (includes $100 usage credit, up to 50 seats, pay-as-you-go top-ups) / Enterprise custom (volume discounts, unlimited concurrency, CMEK, SSO/SCIM). No public free tier; a trial is available.	Freemium· Free open-source core; cloud platform paid
Model	Claude Opus, Claude Sonnet, Gemini, and open-source models via BYOK; routed by proprietary Prism model router	BYO (Claude / GPT / open)
Editorial score	—	8.4 / 10
Use cases	Automated pull-request reviewTest-coverage expansion on legacy codeIncident triage from Slack alertsSecurity vulnerability remediationPR authoring and description generationWork-item triage in JiraMulti-repo refactor orchestrationCI/CD-embedded agent workflowsCustom expert agent authoring	multi-agentorchestrationPython
Pros	Orchestrates multiple specialised agents rather than a single chat assistant, which scales better across large orgs Prism router picks a model per turn and reports 20-30% cost reduction versus single-model setups Proprietary Context Engine indexes large codebases structurally, cutting token spend without quality loss Deep enterprise posture: SOC 2 Type II on Business, plus CMEK, ISO 42001, SSO/SCIM and SIEM on Enterprise Deployment flexibility across laptop, cloud VM, Augment cloud, or self-hosted AWS/GCP BYOK support for Claude, Gemini and open-source models avoids vendor lock-in on inference Pre-built experts for code review, PR authoring, incident response and security remediation ship day one	Clean Python API Strong role/goal abstractions Active community Hosted platform for deployment
Cons	No public free tier; the $100/mo Business floor prices out solo devs and hobbyists Pitched at platform/DevEx teams, so individual engineers get less value than from Cursor or Copilot Cosmos is a young platform and the expert registry is still shallow versus mature CI/CD ecosystems Usage top-ups expire 12 months after purchase, which penalises bursty adoption No open-source release and no publicly documented REST API for third-party integrators	Production observability still maturing Debugging multi-agent flows is hard
Website	www.augmentcode.com	www.crewai.com

Pick Augment Code if

✅ Orchestrates multiple specialised agents rather than a single chat assistant, which scales better across large orgs
✅ Prism router picks a model per turn and reports 20-30% cost reduction versus single-model setups
✅ Proprietary Context Engine indexes large codebases structurally, cutting token spend without quality loss
✅ Deep enterprise posture: SOC 2 Type II on Business, plus CMEK, ISO 42001, SSO/SCIM and SIEM on Enterprise

Pick CrewAI if

✅ Clean Python API
✅ Strong role/goal abstractions
✅ Active community
✅ Hosted platform for deployment

Compare a different pair →