SGLang vs Together AI
A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.
SGLang Fine-tuning | Together AI Fine-tuning | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Open-source high-throughput inference engine for LLMs and multimodal models with OpenAI-compatible serving. | Fine-tune & serve open-weight models (Llama, Mistral, DeepSeek). |
| Category | Fine-tuning | Fine-tuning |
| Pricing | Free· Free, open-source (Apache 2.0); self-hosted infra cost only | Paid· Pay-per-token; fine-tuning per-token |
| Model | Multi-model (DeepSeek, Qwen, Llama, Mistral, GLM, GPT-OSS) | Llama / Mistral / Qwen / DeepSeek and others |
| Editorial score | — | 8.6 / 10 |
| Use cases | llm-servingmultimodal-inferenceself-hostingopenai-compatible-apihigh-throughput-inference | open modelsfine-tuninginference |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Website | sglang.io | www.together.ai |
Pick SGLang if
- ✅ State-of-the-art throughput via speculative decoding and disaggregated prefill/decode
- ✅ OpenAI-compatible endpoints make migration from hosted APIs trivial
- ✅ Broad hardware coverage: NVIDIA, AMD, TPU, Ascend, XPU, CPU
- ✅ Backed by real production users (NVIDIA, xAI, Oracle, LinkedIn)
Pick Together AI if
- ✅ Wide open-model catalogue
- ✅ Competitive inference pricing
- ✅ Fine-tune + serve in one place
- ✅ Dedicated endpoints for production