Open Deep Research vs Superpower ChatGPT
A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.
Open Deep Research Agents | Superpower ChatGPT Agents | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Minimal open-source deep-research agent that iteratively searches, scrapes, and reasons to produce cited markdown reports. | Chrome extension that bolts folders, prompt libraries, and bulk export onto the ChatGPT web UI. |
| Category | Agents | Agents |
| Pricing | Free· Free (MIT); bring your own Firecrawl + LLM API keys | Freemium· Free core features; Pro tier for advanced limits |
| Model | o3-mini (default), DeepSeek R1, or any OpenAI-compatible model | GPT (via ChatGPT UI) |
| Editorial score | 7.2 / 10 | 7.0 / 10 |
| Use cases | deep-researchagent-scaffoldingcompetitive-researchliterature-reviewself-hosted-agent | chatgpt-organizationprompt-managementconversation-exportprompt-libraryworkflow-automation |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Website | github.com | chromewebstore.google.com |
Pick Open Deep Research if
- ✅ Under 500 lines of TypeScript - easy to read, fork, and customize
- ✅ Works with any OpenAI-compatible endpoint including local LLMs
- ✅ Configurable breadth and depth give precise control over research cost
- ✅ MIT licensed with Docker compose setup included
Pick Superpower ChatGPT if
- ✅ Folders, search, and prompt library that the native ChatGPT UI lacks
- ✅ Bulk export to PDF, Markdown, JSON, and TXT
- ✅ Prompt queue lets you chain sequential prompts unattended
- ✅ Conversation tree map makes branched chats navigable