Onlook vs Replit Agent
A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.
Onlook Coding | Replit Agent Coding | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Cursor for Designers — visually edit your React codebase with AI. | Build & deploy a full app from a single prompt. |
| Category | Coding | Coding |
| Pricing | Freemium· Free self-hosted (open source on GitHub); Cloud version pricing custom — contact sales / book a demo. | Freemium· Basic: $10 · Pro: $20 · Enterprise: Contact sales |
| Model | — | Multi-model (Claude / GPT configurable) |
| Editorial score | — | 8.7 / 10 |
| Use cases | Visual editing of a Next.js marketing siteDesigner-driven component refactors in a shared React repoApplying brand tokens across a Tailwind codebasePrototyping new UI sections from natural-language promptsStorybook-driven component library maintenanceHandoff-free design-to-production for small product teamsPublishing landing pages to a custom domain without a dev deploy | prototypesinternal toolsfull-stack agent |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Website | onlook.com | replit.com |
Pick Onlook if
- ✅ Edits the real React/Next.js codebase — no Figma-to-code translation step or drifting design files.
- ✅ Open source with 25k+ GitHub stars and a self-hosted option, so teams can bring their own model keys and keep code private.
- ✅ Visual canvas with drag/resize/restyle that maps cleanly to JSX + Tailwind, making the diff readable to engineers.
- ✅ AI chat can generate components, apply brand tokens, and refactor layouts from natural-language prompts.
Pick Replit Agent if
- ✅ One-prompt → live app
- ✅ Auto-deploys
- ✅ Great for non-engineers
- ✅ Self-corrects errors