LangSmith vs Promptfoo
A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.
LangSmith Evaluation | Promptfoo Evaluation | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | LangChain's eval + observability platform. | Open-source eval and red-teaming framework for LLM apps, prompts, and RAG pipelines. |
| Category | Evaluation | Evaluation |
| Pricing | Freemium· Free starter; Plus $39/mo per seat | Freemium· Open-source free; Enterprise SaaS contact sales |
| Model | Platform (any LLM) | Multi-model |
| Editorial score | 8.7 / 10 | — |
| Use cases | LLM tracingevalsLangChain integration | llm-evalsred-teamingprompt-regressionrag-testingai-securityci-cd-guardrails |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Website | www.langchain.com | promptfoo.dev |
Pick LangSmith if
- ✅ Tight LangChain integration
- ✅ Strong tracing UX
- ✅ Mature dataset/eval flows
- ✅ Reasonable per-seat pricing
Pick Promptfoo if
- ✅ Genuinely open source and self-hostable, not a fake-OSS funnel
- ✅ Model-agnostic; works across OpenAI, Anthropic, local, custom APIs
- ✅ Red-teaming covers prompt injection, jailbreaks, PII, policy violations
- ✅ Clean CI integration with GitHub/GitLab/Jenkins for regression catching