LangSmith vs Prompt Foundry
A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.
LangSmith Evaluation | Prompt Foundry Evaluation | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | LangChain's eval + observability platform. | Prompt management and side-by-side LLM evaluation for OpenAI and Anthropic models. |
| Category | Evaluation | Evaluation |
| Pricing | Freemium· Free starter; Plus $39/mo per seat | Freemium· Free tier (10 prompts, 500 evals/mo); Pro $15/user/mo; Enterprise custom |
| Model | Platform (any LLM) | OpenAI + Anthropic (multi-model) |
| Editorial score | 8.7 / 10 | — |
| Use cases | LLM tracingevalsLangChain integration | prompt-managementmodel-comparisonregression-testingtool-call-testingmultimodal-prompts |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Website | www.langchain.com | promptfoundry.ai |
Pick LangSmith if
- ✅ Tight LangChain integration
- ✅ Strong tracing UX
- ✅ Mature dataset/eval flows
- ✅ Reasonable per-seat pricing
Pick Prompt Foundry if
- ✅ Genuinely usable free tier with GPT-4o-mini included, no API key required
- ✅ Clean side-by-side comparison of OpenAI vs Anthropic models
- ✅ Versioned deployed prompts you can pull from app code via SDK
- ✅ Supports tool calls, variables, and vision inputs in tests