LangGraph vs TeamoRouter
A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.
LangGraph Agents | TeamoRouter Agents | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Stateful, graph-based agent orchestration from LangChain. | Unified LLM gateway that brokers Claude, GPT, and Gemini through one API key with usage-based discounts. |
| Category | Agents | Agents |
| Pricing | Freemium· Free open-source; LangGraph Platform paid | Paid· Pay-as-you-go; rates from ~10% of model list price, avg ~19% hourly discount |
| Model | BYO (Claude / GPT / open) | Multi-model |
| Editorial score | 8.8 / 10 | — |
| Use cases | stateful agentshuman-in-loopproduction | llm-routingmulti-model-accessagent-infrastructurecost-optimizationclaude-code-proxy |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Website | www.langchain.com | teamorouter.com |
Pick LangGraph if
- ✅ Reliable, debuggable agent graphs
- ✅ Built-in persistence + HITL
- ✅ Production-grade
- ✅ Tight LangSmith integration
Pick TeamoRouter if
- ✅ Single API key for Claude, GPT-5.x, and Gemini families
- ✅ Aggressive pricing with hourly real-time discounts versus list rates
- ✅ Agent-protocol aware; targets Claude Code and Codex Desktop users
- ✅ High prompt-cache hit rate (>99% claimed) and multi-region routing