LangGraph vs Open WebUI
A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.
LangGraph Agents | Open WebUI Agents | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Stateful, graph-based agent orchestration from LangChain. | Self-hosted, extensible AI chat platform that runs on your infrastructure |
| Category | Agents | Agents |
| Pricing | Freemium· Developer: $0 / seat per month · Plus: $39 / seat per month · Enterprise: Custom pricing | Freemium· Free (self-hosted, MIT-style community license via pip/Docker) / Enterprise: custom pricing for SSO, RBAC, audit logs, air-gapped deployment, data-residency guarantees |
| Model | BYO (Claude / GPT / open) | Backend-agnostic: any Ollama, llama.cpp, vLLM, or OpenAI-compatible API (OpenAI GPT, Anthropic Claude, Llama 3.x, Qwen, Mistral, Gemma, etc.) |
| Editorial score | 8.8 / 10 | — |
| Use cases | stateful agentshuman-in-loopproduction | Self-hosted ChatGPT alternative for a teamPrivate RAG chatbot over internal documentsUnified gateway across multiple LLM providersAir-gapped LLM chat for regulated industriesOllama front end for local Llama or Qwen modelsCustom Python tools and function callingPrompt library and workspace sharingVoice and vision chat on local modelsModel access control and usage auditingHome-lab AI assistant on a single GPU box |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Website | www.langchain.com | openwebui.com |
Pick LangGraph if
- ✅ Reliable, debuggable agent graphs
- ✅ Built-in persistence + HITL
- ✅ Production-grade
- ✅ Tight LangSmith integration
Pick Open WebUI if
- ✅ Genuinely self-hostable in minutes with Docker or pip; no account or callback required
- ✅ Backend-agnostic: talks to Ollama, llama.cpp, vLLM, OpenAI, Anthropic, Groq, OpenRouter and any OpenAI-compatible API through one UI
- ✅ Built-in RAG over uploaded docs, web search, image generation, voice, and function calling
- ✅ Python pipelines and tools framework lets you extend the app without forking it