Langfuse vs Weights & Biases
A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.
Langfuse Evaluation | Weights & Biases Evaluation | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Open-source LLM observability, prompt management, and evaluation in one platform. | The ML experiment tracker, now with LLM eval features. |
| Category | Evaluation | Evaluation |
| Pricing | Freemium· Free self-host & Hobby tier; Core $29/mo, Pro $199/mo, Enterprise $2,499/mo | Freemium· Free personal; team from $50/mo per seat |
| Model | Model-agnostic | Platform (any LLM) |
| Editorial score | — | 8.4 / 10 |
| Use cases | llm-observabilityprompt-managementllm-evaluationagent-tracingrag-debugging | ML experimentsLLM evalWeave |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Website | langfuse.com | wandb.ai |
Pick Langfuse if
- ✅ Fully open source and self-hostable at no cost
- ✅ Tracing, prompts, and evals in one platform instead of three
- ✅ Built on OpenTelemetry with SDKs for Python and JS
- ✅ Integrates with OpenAI SDK, LangChain, LlamaIndex, and 100+ libraries
Pick Weights & Biases if
- ✅ Industry-standard for ML tracking
- ✅ Weave adds LLM-native eval
- ✅ Mature, reliable
- ✅ Strong enterprise features