Kiln AI vs LangSmith
A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.
Kiln AI Evaluation | LangSmith Evaluation | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Open-source workbench for building, evaluating, and fine-tuning AI agents across 190+ models. | LangChain's eval + observability platform. |
| Category | Evaluation | Evaluation |
| Pricing | Freemium· Free Individual tier; Team (request access); Enterprise (custom) | Freemium· Free starter; Plus $39/mo per seat |
| Model | Multi-model | Platform (any LLM) |
| Editorial score | — | 8.7 / 10 |
| Use cases | llm-evaluationfine-tuningagent-developmentsynthetic-dataragprompt-optimization | LLM tracingevalsLangChain integration |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Website | kiln.tech | www.langchain.com |
Pick Kiln AI if
- ✅ MIT-licensed Python library with 4,500+ GitHub stars
- ✅ Local-first desktop app with Git-versioned datasets
- ✅ Supports 190+ models across OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Ollama, Bedrock
- ✅ Covers build, eval, and fine-tune in one workbench
Pick LangSmith if
- ✅ Tight LangChain integration
- ✅ Strong tracing UX
- ✅ Mature dataset/eval flows
- ✅ Reasonable per-seat pricing