GPT-4o vs Llama 3
A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.
GPT-4o Writing | Llama 3 Writing | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | OpenAI's multimodal flagship behind ChatGPT. | Meta's open-weights LLM family that put serious frontier-adjacent models in everyone's hands. |
| Category | Writing | Writing |
| Pricing | Freemium· Free tier; Plus $20/mo; Pro $200/mo | Free· Weights free under Meta Llama Community License; inference cost via self-hosting or 3rd-party providers |
| Model | GPT-4o | Llama 3 / 3.1 (8B, 70B, 405B) |
| Editorial score | 9.4 / 10 | — |
| Use cases | general writingsummarizationvisionvoice mode | chatlong-context reasoningfine-tuning baselocal inferenceRAG backboneagent workloads |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Website | chatgpt.com | llama.meta.com |
Pick GPT-4o if
- ✅ Strong all-rounder
- ✅ Voice mode is uncannily good
- ✅ Huge ecosystem & plugins
- ✅ Available in ChatGPT, API, Copilot
Pick Llama 3 if
- ✅ Open weights with permissive commercial use up to 700M MAU
- ✅ Massive ecosystem: Ollama, llama.cpp, vLLM, Hugging Face, Unsloth
- ✅ Multiple sizes from laptop-friendly 8B to frontier-class 405B
- ✅ 128K context in 3.1 generation, strong instruction tuning