GitHub Copilot vs Greptile
A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.
GitHub Copilot Coding | Greptile Coding | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | The original AI pair programmer, now with chat and agents. | AI code review that understands the whole codebase, not just the diff |
| Category | Coding | Coding |
| Pricing | Paid· Free for individuals; $10/mo Pro; $19/mo Business | Paid· Free for open-source / $30 per seat/month (includes 50 review credits, $1 per additional credit) / Enterprise (self-hosted, custom) |
| Model | GPT / Claude / OpenAI o-series (configurable) | — |
| Editorial score | 9.1 / 10 | — |
| Use cases | autocompletechatPR reviewagents | Automated pull request reviewCross-file bug detectionEnforcing team coding conventionsRuntime regression testing in sandboxesCodebase Q&A for engineering onboardingRAG backend for internal coding agentsMCP server for Claude Code and CursorSelf-hosted code review in regulated industries |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Website | github.com | www.greptile.com |
Pick GitHub Copilot if
- ✅ Excellent JetBrains + VS Code support
- ✅ Tight GitHub PR integration
- ✅ Now offers multiple model choices
- ✅ Free tier for individuals
Pick Greptile if
- ✅ Whole-repo graph index catches cross-file bugs that diff-only reviewers miss
- ✅ TREX sandbox actually executes tests against the PR to catch behavioural regressions
- ✅ Learns from a team's accept/dismiss patterns, so noise drops over time
- ✅ Custom rules can be written in plain English rather than a DSL