Flux vs Together AI
A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.
 Flux Image Generation |  Together AI Fine-tuning | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Black Forest Labs' open-weights image model — rivals Midjourney quality. | Fine-tune & serve open-weight models (Llama, Mistral, DeepSeek). |
| Category | Image Generation | Fine-tuning |
| Pricing | Freemium· FLUX.2 [max]: $0.07 · FLUX.2 [pro]: $0.03 · FLUX.2 [klein] 9B: $0.015 · FLUX.2 [klein] 4B: $0.014 · FLUX.2 [flex]: $0.05 | Paid· Pay-per-token; fine-tuning per-token |
| Model | Flux.1 [schnell / dev / pro] | Llama / Mistral / Qwen / DeepSeek and others |
| Editorial score | 9.0 / 10 | 8.6 / 10 |
| Use cases | open sourceself-hostedhigh quality | open modelsfine-tuninginference |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Website | blackforestlabs.ai | www.together.ai |
Pick Flux if
- ✅ Open weights for [schnell]/[dev] variants
- ✅ Quality rivals Midjourney
- ✅ Excellent prompt adherence
- ✅ Self-hostable
Pick Together AI if
- ✅ Wide open-model catalogue
- ✅ Competitive inference pricing
- ✅ Fine-tune + serve in one place
- ✅ Dedicated endpoints for production