DALL·E 3 vs Flux
A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.
DALL·E 3 Image Generation |  Flux Image Generation | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | OpenAI's image model — strong on prompt adherence and text-in-image. | Black Forest Labs' open-weights image model — rivals Midjourney quality. |
| Category | Image Generation | Image Generation |
| Pricing | Freemium· Basic: $10 · Pro: $20 | Freemium· FLUX.2 [max]: $0.07 · FLUX.2 [pro]: $0.03 · FLUX.2 [klein] 9B: $0.015 · FLUX.2 [klein] 4B: $0.014 · FLUX.2 [flex]: $0.05 |
| Model | DALL·E 3 | Flux.1 [schnell / dev / pro] |
| Editorial score | 8.6 / 10 | 9.0 / 10 |
| Use cases | postersinfographicstext-in-image | open sourceself-hostedhigh quality |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Website | openai.com | blackforestlabs.ai |
Pick DALL·E 3 if
- ✅ Best prompt adherence
- ✅ Renders readable text
- ✅ Inside ChatGPT
- ✅ Pay-per-image API for high-volume
Pick Flux if
- ✅ Open weights for [schnell]/[dev] variants
- ✅ Quality rivals Midjourney
- ✅ Excellent prompt adherence
- ✅ Self-hostable