Cursor vs Windsurf
A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.
Cursor Coding | Windsurf Coding | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | AI-first VS Code fork — chat, edit, and agentic coding in one IDE. | AI-native IDE turned agent command center, now folded into Cognition's Devin lineup. |
| Category | Coding | Coding |
| Pricing | Freemium· Free hobby; Pro $20/mo; Business $40/mo | Freemium· Free; Pro $20/mo; Max $200/mo; Teams $80/mo + $40/seat; Enterprise custom |
| Model | Claude / GPT (configurable) | SWE-1.6 Fast (plus Claude Agent, OpenCode via ACP) |
| Editorial score | 9.5 / 10 | — |
| Use cases | codingrefactorsagentic editsIDE | ai-idecoding-agentscode-completioncodebase-searchagent-orchestration |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Website | cursor.com | windsurf.com |
Pick Cursor if
- ✅ Best-in-class multi-file edits
- ✅ Choice of underlying models
- ✅ Composer agent is genuinely useful
- ✅ Tab completion is faster than Copilot
Pick Windsurf if
- ✅ Full IDE plus multi-agent command center in one app
- ✅ Free tier with unlimited SWE-1.6 Fast usage
- ✅ Agent Client Protocol opens it to Claude, OpenCode, and others
- ✅ Spaces with Git worktrees keep parallel agents from clobbering each other